“What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke [sic] who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex — what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute.” — Rush Limbaugh
Hi.
We don’t know a lot about each other.
But I want you to know one thing about me – I am not a slut.
I am a woman. I am a woman as God created me, born from a woman, with the ability to have children of my own one day.
But I am not a slut.
I am a woman with a flawed body, as so many of us are. Ten percent of women suffer from endometriosis, a condition where the lining of one’s uterus grows on the outside of her uterine wall or on other organs. I was born this way. It does not make me a slut.
The treatment is prescription birth control, which does not cure,because there is no cure, but it allows women with this condition to have a life. To leave the couch. To love.
We can wax philosphically about how fertility is a natural process, not a disease to be medicated a way. But digestion is a natural process as well, and millions of people suffer from heartburn. Our bodies are not perfect. They are fearfully and wonderfully made, but they can trouble us and they can hurt us.
But that does not make us sluts.
I am a married woman who loves my husband. I am a woman who wants to have children. I am a woman who does not believe in “consequence free sex,” who does not see the birth control pill as a license to sleep around. I am bound by the vows I have freely taken to my husband and my God; I am not bound to fidelity by the fertile status of my uterus.
If my insurer did not cover birth control, for instance, if I had gone to a Catholic school, I would have spent $1200 while in graduate school just for the ability to attend classes not in pain, to cook my husband dinner occasionally, to attend church, to see friends and to volunteer.
That’s $1200 that covered the cost of two classes instead.
Or that allowed me to research my thesis full time this summer.
Or that allowed my husband to take a lesser paying job to fight for the rights of prisoners and the accused.
Twelve hundred dollars that we could put to supporting local farmers instead of large corporations who rely on underpaid workers.
Twelve hundred dollars that covered the cost of flights home for weddings and Christmases.
Twelve hundred dollars that went to my other medications as well.
I think it was money well spent. It was money, however, that did not turn me into a slut.
But many people think otherwise. They think that medicating the body that God has given me so that I can use it to its fullest potential makes me a slut.
A slut.
A prostitute.
In some ways, it doesn’t matter where you stand on this divide. If you take birth control or if you don’t. If you think it is moral or immoral. If you think government should cover all of health care or none of it. It doesn’t matter, because a reproductive disorder does not make a woman a slut.
Call your representative. Tell him or her to stand up for women. To not bar women from the discussion on what happens to their organs. To raise the level of discussion to one that respects all Americans, all people. To stop calling your sister, your daughter, your mother, your neice, your friend a slut.
I agree that insurers should cover birth control, and I agree that the rhetoric over this issue has gotten out of control. BUT I almost wonder how fruitful it is to blow it out of proportion the other way.
At many places, you can get generic birth control for $9/month. It is not even worth it for me to submit it to my insurance at that price. The most expensive price I have seen is $40/month for generics. I paid that for a year because I didn’t want to lie to my Catholic employer and say that it was not for birth control purposes. (Although later I did, and they covered it…) Why do we need to make such a big deal out of this?
Not sure where you get the $1200 figure from – perhaps with your specific health conditions you require some specialty meds.
I feel like the more we engage this issue, the more it detracts from the really important issues of access to health care that have a much bigger impact.
Anyway, that is my soapbox. Keep up the thoughtful posts!
Thanks for sharing your opinion. $1200 is if I was spending $50 a month for 24 months. It might not be a lot, but it adds up.
Just wanted to comment to say that I have a particular BC that costs around $85/month until I meet my prescription deductible.. which usually happens around mid-year (even then it’s around $30). This is because this particular BC doesn’t have a generic yet. I’ve been on other various BCs for my needs and the cheaper one that worked stopped working because my body got used it, others my body has had an adverse reaction to the hormones. So… if we’re going for 24 months, I’m up to almost $1400 myself. So that number is definitely possible.
Well written. And I like your blog title – I was born in Maine and grew up on that book. Glad I found this page from googling that Limbaugh quote!
I love this! You are so strong for standing up and raising your voice about this issue! I’m a 22 year old devout Catholic who was diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome when I was 15 years old. My menstrual cycle was completely flip flopped due to my body trying to compensate for the changes that it was going through, and for two years I suffered with a three week cycle with one week off because my family was too conservative to let their “baby girl” be on birth control at such a young age. When I was 17 I finally stood up and told them that it was no longer an option to deny me the right to birth control because of religious beliefs. Five years later I pay $54 EVERY month out of my own pocket while I go to college full time and tutor part time because my mother works for the archdiocese and our insurance doesn’t cover the medication that helps keep my hormones in balance to produce a normal monthly cycle. I rely on birth control everyday of my life, but I am not a slut.
The whole “slut” thing is insane beyond inappropriate, but I’m not sure that your situation is relevant to the Georgetown debate except for the fact that the debate is already being skewed. From all that I’ve read Georgetown does provide students with health conditions with the drugs that they need for those conditions. The fact that it fell through for one woman http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/health/policy/law-fuels-contraception-controversy-on-catholic-campuses.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2&sq=georgetown&st=cse&scp=6 royally stinks, but that seems pretty typical of any insurance company, not reflective of whether Georgetown’s insurance is somehow failing to cover artificial hormones to those who need it for health reasons. Even FUS and other uber-conservative Catholic schools are being accused of covering contraception because they do cover it if a student presents a medical reason.
I don’t think that even using the pill for contraception makes a woman a slut, or makes it okay to call her one. But it is warping things even more to make it an issue of non-contraceptive healthcare since I still haven’t encountered a Catholic university which doesn’t offer an exemption for health purposes. Maybe I should look into Ave Maria though?
Oh, and one last complaint. As far as I can tell, no one seems to give an anything about women’s actual reproductive health. HHS isn’t mandating covering the pill because it helps women such as yourself function on a day-to-day basis. They are saying to cover it because it is preventive, because it prevents pregnancy and saves a ton of money in the long run. No one is standing up for women in terms of covering costs associated with reproductive disorders or any of the other “non-preventive” drugs you might need. Do correct me if I’m missing something!
Hey Jackie! I appreciate your post and think it’s so important to promote awareness of the medical uses of the pill that Sandra Fluke was testifying about. At the same time, I agree with some of your other commentators. I don’t think a woman should have to defend her use of the pill on the grounds that it is necessary for non-reproductive health!
We need to stand strong here. The word ‘slut’ has no business on Rush Limbaugh’s lips, or anyone’s for that matter.
You are not a slut, even if you use the pill strictly for contraception, even if you have sex with more than one partner. And really, is there any association between oral contraceptive usage and greater number of sexual partners? Wow, three sexual partners before marriage. How slutty!
So then let’s mention all the married women who use birth control. My mom (happily married to my dad) took the pill from when my brother and I were born until she went through menopause, strictly for contraception. Wow, what a slut!
So it’s not even the sexual act itself – or the number of partners — but the desire for sex without procreation that makes one a slut these days. So all women — even monogamous ones — who have sex for non-procreative purposes are wanton harlots seducing their poor helpless boyfriends and husbands.
It’s curious how there’s no equivalent word for males for “slut”, huh? Interesting what you can get away with when you don’t have to carry the evidence of your deeds around for 9 months or face a risky and emotionally trying medical procedure.
Limbaugh’s comments were so out-of-line that I can only think now that all this time he’s been a troll secretly planted by the Democratic party in order to make radical conservatives look insane. Good one!
But anyway thanks for sharing your own testimony. It’s very important.
Steph